The dentition of money stems from its first and most commonly understood function – a generally accepted medium of exchange. This essentially means that money is anything that will be widely accepted in society in exchange for goods and services. As a medium of exchange, money serves as a common form through which transactions can occur and therefore easily facilitates the purchase and sale of goods and services. If there was no money, goods would be exchanged for other goods (bartering). While this may seem simple, it requires a ‘double coincidence of wants’. This means that if one individual produces a specific good such as bananas, but wants to get oranges, he will have to search for someone who 1) has oranges and 2) also wants bananas. This may not always be easy. With money, the banana producer can simply sell his bananas to anyone who wants them and earn money, which he can then use to purchase oranges from someone else who has them for sale.
Although its role as a medium of exchange usually serves as its defining function, money also has other functions, namely, as a store of value and a unit of account. Its role as a store of value is related to the medium of exchange function. Revisiting the example involving the oranges and bananas cited above, it is possible that both individuals want the respective fruit that the other is offering, but not necessarily immediately. However, because these items are perishable, they cannot be saved for an extended period of time. Money, however, is a convenient way to store value or purchasing power for use whenever needed. To be able to serve this role, the value of the money must be stable. This means that rising price levels (inflation) can affect the amount of goods and services a fixed amount of money can purchase. As such, in order not to undermine the store of value function, price levels should be stable.
Finally, money serves as a unit of account. In this role, money acts as a standard way to measure different items and allows for a comparison of these different items. For instance, to continue with the above example, we can introduce a third producer of mangoes. If this third producer is willing to accept either oranges or bananas for his mangoes he will not know which is the better deal as one orange and one banana are not equal measurements. Therefore, having a common unit in which items can be measured or valued against ensures transparency and a common understanding.